I would just like to reiterate my support for the next hop information to be added as an extension...there are just no alternatives available and the quicker it makes it in as an extension, the more likely its usefulness will be exploited. I believe it is a small addition.
Alan Watkins Install Strategy and Development http://isdweb.rtp.raleigh.ibm.com/ 919-543-9262 Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .net> To Internet Area <[email protected]> 09/06/2008 05:48 cc AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] etf.org, Ron Bonica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "W. Mark Townsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alan Watkins/Raleigh/[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] .ietf.org Subject WGLC for draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered This is the start of the two week WG last call period for draft-atlas-icmp-unnumered. Please send comments by September 20th, 2008. The intended status of the draft is Proposed Standard. Given that there has been other proposals in this space too and some discussion about what the drafts should contain: please take the intended scope of the document as ICMP extensions useful for retrieving more interface and next-hop related information in a traceroute/error situation. That is, please consider whether functionality defined in draft-watkins-icmptype11code0 is also something that should be defined. I only want to progress one document on this, however (or at least coordinate the formats). Jari
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: pic28750.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
