Hi,
Ran and I drafted this in reaction to discussion in the Routing Research
Group about the impracticality of renumbering. We'd like comments and, above
all, contributions. Also, where should this be discussed, apart from
the RRG list?
Brian
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-00.txt
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
Title : Renumbering still needs work
Author(s) : B. Carpenter, R. Atkinson
Filename : draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-00.txt
Pages : 18
Date : 2008-10-23
This document reviews the existing mechanisms for site renumbering
for both IPv4 and IPv6, and identifies operational issues with those
mechanisms. It also summarises current technical proposals for
additional mechanisms. Finally there is a gap analysis.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-00.txt
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
