Dave,
I see
you gave one example, the effect of delay or packet
drop...; actually we need a more tightly scoped
description even than that to build an experimental
design (e.g., effect on what, in what topology,
etc.). You get my point.
Sure. I was just giving an example, and it know it was too vague. I
think it would be great if the charter had specific language about this,
or if writing the list of most important things to measure would itself
be a deliverable.
That was a suggestion from a few folks on
[email protected].
Here's my question: Are you saying that it should be
removed as a work item/milestone from the charter?
Yes.
It would be cool to see a document on deployment incentives or an
evolution plan, similar to what Dan Jen presented in the last RRG
meeting. I don't know if you can get someone to write one.
Here's my question: Are you saying you want to add such a
document as a work item?
Yes.
Jari
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
