Carsten Bormann wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2009, at 18:49, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > > > Maybe other areas like TSV have specific reasons to create a WG like > > TSVWG which has lots of documents, I don't see the same in Int-Area. > > Note that TSV has both a "general transport stuff" WG (TSVWG -- *not* > chaired by the ADs) and tends to meet as TSVAREA (open meeting, no > deliverables). > > I do think the charter proposed would fit an INTWG well. I would hate > to lose the open forum style INTAREA, too.
Why couldn't we retain the open forum part in an INTAREA WG. Having WG documents and progressing them is not exclusive with having open discussions on unchartered work -- this is already happening in many working groups. --julien _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
