Hi, all,

This version includes changes to address feedback by the IESG, which focus on providing context on the impact of this change on existing use and some clarifications.

Joe

On 10/9/2012 1:21 PM, [email protected] wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
  This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group Working Group of 
the IETF.

        Title           : Updated Specification of the IPv4 ID Field
        Author(s)       : Joe Touch
        Filename        : draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-06.txt
        Pages           : 18
        Date            : 2012-10-09

Abstract:
    The IPv4 Identification (ID) field enables fragmentation and
    reassembly, and as currently specified is required to be unique
    within the maximum lifetime for all datagrams with a given
    source/destination/protocol tuple. If enforced, this uniqueness
    requirement would limit all connections to 6.4 Mbps. Because
    individual connections commonly exceed this speed, it is clear that
    existing systems violate the current specification. This document
    updates the specification of the IPv4 ID field in RFC791, RFC1122,
    and RFC2003 to more closely reflect current practice and to more
    closely match IPv6 so that the field's value is defined only when a
    datagram is actually fragmented. It also discusses the impact of
    these changes on how datagrams are used.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-06

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-06


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to