Dear all, This version integrates the first set of comments received during the IESG review. The main changes are:
* Add a sentence to clarify why no recommendation is included * Add a sentence to clarify a host can be any computer located behind a CPE or directly connected to an address-sharing function * Remove Section 1.1 and dispatch the bullets in the core text of Section 3 * Add a sentence to the privacy section to say an address-sharing function can be configured with different end-users policies * Clarify what is meant by "encrypted traffic" in Table 1 * Add a sentence to the privacy section to request specification document to check whether location information may/may not be exposed using HOST_ID solutions * Add a new items for the TCP option to mention it may interfere with the use of Fast Open extension * Add some pointers to behave documents. * Other minor edits. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la >part de [email protected] >Envoyé : mercredi 10 avril 2013 10:58 >À : [email protected] >Cc : [email protected] >Objet : [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis- >07.txt > > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >directories. > This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group Working Group >of the IETF. > > Title : Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host >Identifier (HOST_ID) in Shared Address Deployments > Author(s) : Mohamed Boucadair > Joe Touch > Pierre Levis > Reinaldo Penno > Filename : draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-07.txt > Pages : 22 > Date : 2013-04-10 > >Abstract: > This document is a collection of solutions to reveal a host > identifier (denoted as HOST_ID) when a Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) or > application proxies are involved in the path. This host identifier > could be used by a remote server to sort out the packets by sending > host. The host identifier must be unique to each host under the same > shared IP address. > > This document analyzes a set of solution candidates to reveal a host > identifier; no recommendation is sketched in the document. > > >The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis > >There's also a htmlized version available at: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-07 > >A diff from the previous version is available at: >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-07 > > >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >_______________________________________________ >Int-area mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
