On 06/13/2013 01:59 AM, Joe Touch wrote: > FWIW, I added INTAREA, because I don't consider potentially killing off > IPv6 header extensions as merely maintenance (6man) or operational (v6ops).
We're trying to do exactly the opposite: try to define under which constraints we can expect them to work. If we continue on the current path (do nothing), they will be effectively killed. (see Brian et al's I-D, Warren et al's I-D, etc.). Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
