Hi, Lishi,
First, you should consider some of the previous "4+4" or "8+8" proposals
that use two layers of IP in ways similar to your approach, and you
should address how yours is distinct. The same is true for I3
(Cheriton's DNS-based forwarding), for similar reasons.
There are many issues that are not yet addressed in this proposal:
- impact on DNS: how does this proposal affect the following:
- current DNS delegations do not correspond to either
routing areas or physical locations
- current DNS entries are intended to provide full
flexibility with IP addresses
Equally importantly, there is a coupling between IP and various
transports, esp. TCP, where a subset of the IP header is considered part
of the TCP header (the pseudoheader). This doc needs to address how that
relationship is affected.
Others will probably have additional feedback.
Joe
On 3/20/2014 11:05 PM, 李实 wrote:
Dear all, especially the DNS experts and the IPv6 experts:
Although IPv6 has been selected as IPng for over 20 years, it has been
proved that it was very difficult to promote. I think the reason is simply
because IPv6 is incompatible with IPv4.
I just submitted a new proposal named 'dbnetlayer' as IPng. Compared to
IPv6, my proposal not only extends the address space, but also is highly
compatible with IPv4. Thus only very few devices are required to upgrade (most
L3 devices need not to upgrade). This proposal achieves this by adding a
Domain Name layer above the IP layer in the protocol stack, which means the DNS
must make a little modification to fit the protocol stack.
This is a very simple proposal, and I hope you will have interest to have
a glance at it.
The draft is at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lishi-ipngwg-dbnetlayer-00.txt
Thanks.
Lishi
China TeleCom
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
发送时间: 2014年3月5日 14:18
收件人: Shi Li; Shi Li
主题: New Version Notification for draft-lishi-ipngwg-dbnetlayer-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-lishi-ipngwg-dbnetlayer-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Shi Li and posted to the IETF repository.
Name: draft-lishi-ipngwg-dbnetlayer
Revision: 00
Title: Double Network Layer solution as IPng
Document date: 2014-03-04
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 10
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lishi-ipngwg-dbnetlayer-00.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lishi-ipngwg-dbnetlayer/
Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lishi-ipngwg-dbnetlayer-00
Abstract:
This document describes a new proposal for IPng. Compared to IPv6,
this proposal has bigger address space, and most importantly, is
HIGHLY COMPATIBLE with IPv4.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
