On 09/06/14 14:46, Brandon Williams wrote: > > Would you please indicate where the draft proposes a new identifier? If > you are seeing a proposal for protocol changes somewhere in the draft, > editing work is required in order to either clarify or excise the > associated text.
Fair enough that its an assumption of mine that adding some kind of identifier is required to meet the (no-longer mis-stated:-) requirements for these use-cases. But I think that is logically required, and its valid to draw obvious conclusions and its also invalid to ignore obvious conclusions. S. _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
