I'm also in favor of adopting the draft. Regards, -drc
On Jun 16, 2014, at 3:27 AM, Prashanth Patil <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm in favor of adopting this draft. The document describes relevant > use-cases for identifying hosts behind NAT, which is useful when considering > solutions. > > > -Prashanth > -----Original Message----- > From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh > Krishnan > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 9:51 AM > To: Internet Area > Subject: [Int-area] Call for adoption of > draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04 > > > Hi all, > > This draft was originally intended to be published as an AD sponsored > submission from the OPS area, but the authors have expressed their interest > to continue this work in the intarea wg given that RFC6269 and RFC6967 > originated here. The draft has been updated to address the issues brought up > during earlier discussions on the wg mailing list and the latest version of > the draft is available at > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04 > > > This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG consensus > towards adoption of draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04 as > an intarea WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the > adoption by replying to this email. If you are not in favor, please also > state your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on > 2014-06-19. > > > Regards > > Suresh & Juan Carlos > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
