On 7/16/2014 3:13 PM, C. M. Heard wrote:
Even it I don't agree with all of them, the filtering
recommendations in this draft do seem to motivated by legitimate operational
concerns, not blanket paranoia.
They need to be characterized as what they are:
- an attempt to accommodate devices that are NOT IPv6-compliant
I agree that there are legitimate operational concerns, but redefining
the behavior or the IPv6 flags is not the purview of operational or
management groups in the IETF.
If these features cannot be supported, then deprecate them through
standards-track updates, not by de-facto deprecation through operational
neutering.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
