Hi Ron, Somehow, the list choked on my last couple of messages so I will convert to plaintext:
> The approach taken by RFC 2473 is similar, but not identical to the approach > taken by draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6. Please compare the text in RFC 2473, > Section 7.1.b to the corresponding text in Section 3.1 of > draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6. > They are different and need to remain different in order to accommodate future > possibilities. Here is the difference: >>> o send an ICMPv6 Packet Too Big (PTB) [RFC4443] message to the IPv6 >>> packet source. The MTU field in the ICMPv6 PTB message is set to >>> the GMTU. This is the part that would trigger atomic fragments if GMTU is less than 1280. Drop this, and you have RFC2473 exactly. Thanks - Fred [email protected] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
