Hi Lucy,
The goal of this draft is *not* to prove the GRE behaves identically with IPv6
as it does with IPv4. In fact, its goal is to point out the differences.
Can you think of any differences between the two GRE environments that we have
failed to point out?
Ron
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 15:25:54 +0000
> From: Lucy yong <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Int-area] comment on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D4545BB21@dfweml701-
> chm>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi,
>
> If this draft is to document the protocol of gre in IPv6 exact same as of gre
> in
> IPv4 and update rfc2784, IMHO, it should point out the gre application
> behavior differences in IPv4 network and IPv6 network. The exact same
> protocol does not mean the same behavior for an application since IPv4 and
> IPv6 networks have different behaviors such as header checksum.
>
> Thanks,
> Lucy
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
