Hi David, > > This is where we differ - there is nothing in this recommendation > > that is specific to GRE - the recommendation applies to any generic > > IPv6 encapsulation and is appropriate to only those use cases where > > shutting down the tunnel altogether is preferable to allowing the > > tunnel to fragment. This is a generic IPv6 encapsulation consideration; > > not a GRE consideration. > > The "running code" involved here is GRE. I am concerned that we lack > the foundation to update 2473 for all encapsulated protocols.
I don't get that. Just write a 3-pager that says it is OK for any kind of tunnel to collapse if it gets into a state where fragmentation is needed; a halt-and-catch-fire clause. But, why would you even need an RFC for that? Thanks - Fred [email protected] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
