On 6/19/2016 7:47 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote: > Sure. That's why we usually need to determine a WG which is more suitable for > a given draft firstly in the IETF. If you firmly believe the more suitable WG > for draft-ietf-nvo3-gue is NVO3, rather than INTAREA and TSVWG, please give > your rationale
My rationale is simple - it's sufficient and that's where it already is a WG doc. If that were not the case, you'd have a stronger argument. But I really don't care all that much. If the chairs want to shift WGs, then they can make the case for a call for adoption elsewhere. However, given the substantial review this doc has already received both here and from TSV reviewers, I think that's largely wasted effort. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
