On 7/4/2016 6:16 PM, wangzitao wrote: > Please review it. Comments, questions, and input are welcome! > >
IP in IP usually cites RFC2003, which is standards-track, rather than 1853. 2003 is IPv4 in IPv4; IPv6 wasn't spec'd until 457 RFCs later. IPv6 in IPv6 is 2473. The references are incomplete. Clear-df is ambiguous - tunnel ingresses MUST be able to source-fragment encapsulated packets. The decision on whether to fragment the "inner" packet (transiting the tunnel, i.e., the TTP per draft-intarea-tunnels) is made by the associated router, not at the (virtual tunnel) interface (i.e., corresponding to the ingress). Nearly every parameter for this model of a tunnel interface really ought to parallel that for other L2 interfaces. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
