On 11/01/2017 06:55, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I am looking at the section that says:
>
> "3.4. Redirects
> There is potential for adverse interaction with any off-link Redirect
> (Redirect for a destination that is not on-link) message sent by a
> router in accordance with Section 8 of [RFC4861]. Hosts SHOULD apply
> off-link redirects only for the specific pair of source and
> destination addresses concerned, so the host's Destination Cache
> might need to contain appropriate source-specific entries. This
> extends the validity check specified in Section 8.1 of [RFC4861]."
>
> What is being proposed in the document I submitted is the inclusion of
> RIOs in Redirect messages for a *prefix* that is not on-link, as opposed
> to a singleton destination. So, the same SHOULD in the paragraph above
> would seem to apply also to prefix redirection the same as for ordinary
> destination redirection.
I didn't want to bias your reading, but that was my conclusion too. If
correct, maybe your draft needs to cite RFC8028 and augment it accordingly.
Regards
Brian
>
> Thanks - Fred
> [email protected]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 2:08 PM
>> To: Templin, Fred L <[email protected]>; 6man WG <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Route Information Options in Redirect Messages
>>
>> Fred,
>>
>> Can you check that there would be no adverse interaction with RFC8028,
>> especially https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8028#section-3.4
>>
>> Regards
>> Brian
>>
>> On 10/01/2017 04:51, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>>> See below for a new draft that proposes to update RFC4861 and RFC4191 to
>>> permit the inclusion of Route Information Options in Redirect Messages.
>>> This represents a backward-compatible extension to the IPv6 ND Redirect
>>> function. Please review and comment on the list.
>>>
>>> Fred
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>> [email protected]
>>> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 1:52 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-templin-intarea-rio-redirect-00.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> directories.
>>>
>>>
>>> Title : Route Information Options in Redirect Messages
>>> Author : Fred L. Templin
>>> Filename : draft-templin-intarea-rio-redirect-00.txt
>>> Pages : 5
>>> Date : 2017-01-06
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>> The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery protocol provides a Redirect function
>>> allowing routers to inform hosts of a better next hop on the link
>>> toward the destination. This document specifies a backward-
>>> compatible extension to the Redirect function to allow routers to
>>> include forwarding information that the source can associate with the
>>> next hop.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-intarea-rio-redirect/
>>>
>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-rio-redirect-00
>>>
>>>
>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> .
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
