Tom,

see inline.

Am 3/9/17 um 6:13 PM schrieb t.petch:
I wonder if the mix of SHOULD and should is intentional.

And I cannot recall seeing RFC2119 as an Informative Reference before.


Will be fixed.

s.1
/  entierly/  entirely/

thanks, will be fixed, too.


And I am surprised at the lack of mention of IPv6 which did its bit for
the planet by eliminating broadcast.


Multicast in many cases is not any better from the perspective of the size of the receiver group, which is why this traffic is more sensitive to privacy concerns. The document therefore discusses both broadcast and multicast. We will update the document, including a section on broadcast and multicast properties as suggested by Joe earlier. It should be much clearer then.

Thanks,

Rolf


Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Carlos Zuniga" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 9:09 PM


Dear Int-Area WG,

A review of draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider has been published.
Since
there was good support for this document from the beginning and the
new
version addresses the pending comments, we believe it is ready for WG
Last
Call.

This email starts an Int-Area WG Last Call on:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-broadcast-consider-02

Please respond to this email to support the document and/or send
comments
by 2017-03-20.

In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with
Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR)":
Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
(See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)

Best,

Juan Carlos Zuniga & Wassim Haddad
(Int-Area WG co-chairs)



------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to