On 3/14/2017 7:01 PM, Chema Gonzalez wrote:
> 2 minor comments:
>
> 1. There is a small typo. Where it says:
>
> B.1. Priveleged ports
>
> It should say:
>
> B.1. Privileged ports
>
> 2. Not sure whether this is right or not: Sections 3.3.2 and 5.4.1
> suggest the use of 94 as the next proto header value ("(proto =
> 94,IPIP)"). Both linux/include/uapi/linux/in.h and
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IP_protocol_numbers suggest the
> right ipip value is 4.
Wikipedia isn't authoritative; IANA is:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml
> The wiki link suggests 94 was used by "KA9Q NOS
> compatible IP over IP tunneling", while the linux kernel points at
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nikander-esp-beet-mode-05.
This is a good reason to check with IANA. You'll find there:
94 IPIP IP-within-IP Encapsulation Protocol
[John_Ioannidis
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml#John_Ioannidis>]
See RFC1853, which explains why John has that assignment.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
