Folks, The liaison is from the IEEE 802.1 WG so will not be on the noted IEEE 802 liaison page.
I presume it will eventually show up on the IETF liaison site Cheers, Glenn. -----Original Message----- From: Juan Carlos Zuniga [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 9:42 PM To: Erik Nordmark <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: Glenn Parsons <[email protected]>; Paul Nikolich <[email protected]> ([email protected]) <[email protected]>; John Messenger <[email protected]>; Janos Farkas <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Int-area] [www.ietf.org/rt #163372] Liaison from IEEE 802.1 WG to IETF IntArea WG Thanks for the quick response Erik. I'm CC'ing some IEEE 802 members that are not in the IntArea mailing list. I hope they can provide some answers to your questions below. Best, Juan Carlos > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Nordmark [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: March 22, 2017 8:10 PM > To: Juan Carlos Zuniga <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Int-area] [www.ietf.org/rt #163372] Liaison from IEEE > 802.1 WG to IETF IntArea WG > > On 03/22/2017 02:30 PM, Juan Carlos Zuniga wrote: > > Dear IntArea WG, > > > > > > > > Please note that we have received the attached liaison letter from > > the IEEE 802.1 WG with respect to "IP over intentionally partially > > partitioned links" draft-nordmark-intarea-ippl-05. > > I don't see the document listed on > http://www.ieee802.org/Communications.shtml#Comm_1703 > > Will it be added there so we can refer to it? > > > Some more detailed comments below: > > > 1. The tone of the draft should be, "how a router can take advantage > > of the Asymmetric (Private) VLAN feature offered by 802.1Q bridges." > > > 2. Modifying the section in question to describe how it works, > > without any conformance language on bridge behavior but explaining > > 802.1Q standard bridge configuration instead. > > > 3. Make a normative reference to 802.1Q. > > My bad; I thought I already had it as a reference. > However, I'm not sure it can be normative since both annex B and annex > F are marked as informational in 802.1Q-1998. It wasn't clear to me > that there is sufficient material in the normative parts of > 802.1Q-1998 to describe the required behaviors for promiscuous, community, > and isolated ports. > > If the 802.1 group is asserting that all of those behaviors are > (optional) parts of the 802.1Q-1998 standard it would be helpful to > know that. > > In addition, if possible, also to have more specific references to > normative sections in 802.1Q which describe this behavior. > > We'd still need some explanatory text in the draft to map between the > 802.1Q terminology and the "promiscuous, community, isolated" > terminology that is used in industry. Before seeing the test I can't > tell whether such text would need to have RFc2119 terms to describe > the mapping. However, I don't think that would be a constraints on > bridge implementations but instead statements of the form "for the > purposes if running IP over 802.1Q we assume that > promisc/community/isolated ports are configured as follows using the 802.1Q > asymetric VLAN standard... > > But that is predicated on the all the necessary "private VLAN" > behaviors being part of the IEEE 802.1Q-1998 standard. So I'd be > greatful for clarifications on that point before I start editing the draft. > > > Thanks, > Erik > > > > > > > If you have any comments, please send them to the list. > > > > > > > > We will also allocate some time for to discuss about this during our > > meeting in Chicago. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Juan-Carlos & Wassim > > > > (IntArea WG co-chairs) > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:*Glenn Parsons [mailto:[email protected]] > > *Sent:* March 22, 2017 4:26 AM > > *To:* [email protected]; Juan Carlos Zuniga > > <[email protected]>; Suresh Krishnan > > <[email protected]>; Wassim Haddad > > <[email protected]> > > *Cc:* Paul Nikolich <[email protected]> ([email protected]) > > <[email protected]>; John Messenger > > <[email protected]>; Janos Farkas > > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > *Subject:* Liaison from IEEE 802.1 WG to IETF IntArea WG > > > > > > > > Please find attached a liaison from the IEEE 802.1 WG. > > > > > > > > I will be available to present this during the IntArea WG meeting. > > This is in regards to your agenda item #4. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Glenn. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Glenn Parsons - Chair, IEEE 802.1 > > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > > +1-613-963-8141 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Int-area mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
