On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Khaled Omar wrote:
As has been stated again and again. Your proposal would have been interesting
if it was presented in 1995, or perhaps even in 2000.
FYI, IPv10 will allow IPv4 to communicate to IPv6 and vice versa, how can it be
interesting if it was presented before IPv6 was even developed !
Because your ideas could possibly have been included in IPv6 and we would
have had support for it by now. Now you're 20 years too late, and your
energy would be better spent trying to make IPv6 more deployable without
changing the on-wire packet format.
You're grossly underestimating the effort and time to get devices into the
field to properly support a new packet format.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
