On 7/19/2017 1:46 AM, [email protected] wrote: > So making use of MPTCP to grab more resources (when available) or to provide > better resiliency (when a network attachment is lost) will require both > endpoints to be MPTCP-capable. That is both correct and appropriate.
Doing tricks to demonstrate that an attacker (i.e., something that modifies TCP segments on path) can do otherwise should not be considered a viable alternative. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
