Re-, Please see inline.
Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : jeudi 20 juillet 2017 16:37 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; Olivier Bonaventure; Internet Area; tsv- > [email protected] > Objet : Re: [Int-area] Middleboxes to aid the deployment of MPTCP > > > > On 7/19/2017 10:39 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > > > The text can always be worked out. This is not an IETF LC :) > Agreed - I was explaining that the current text - and many of the > responses in this chain, both from you and others, continues to be > confusing. > [Med] Calling out those confusing points would help. > > The main point is that we are following your suggestion to define the > solution as an application proxy using a dedicated port number. > As feedback for the doc, that could be made more explicit, including in > the title (this is an application proxy, not typically referred to as > middleboxes). > [Med] Looks like a good idea to me. > That also includes limiting the doc to using TCP app-layer APIs and > describing any behavior that *might* happen at the segment level as just > that - hypothetical, perhaps desired, but NOT the mechanism being > proposed. > > FWIW. > > Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
