This is the way I see it.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv10 does not exist.
Name IPv10 for a mailing list at IETF sounds as a non starter. In the
past several people proposed IPv7, IPv8 or IPv9. Each had pros and
cons. I think the current wisdom is that it is nonsense to talk any
other v than IPv4 or IPv6 in the Internet.
IPv4 and IPv6 are not like Windows7 and Windows 10, nor like firefox 35
and firefox 53.
That said.
I think there are many improvements necessary in the IP protocols.
These could be explored in a separate email list. It could also be an
IRTF email list ('R' for Research, instead of 'E' for Engineering;
Research is a good thing too). Have you asked this?
Second, the problem of connecting the existing IPv4 Internet to a future
Internet Protocol like IPv6 is a real problem.
Alex
Le 14/09/2017 à 17:57, Khaled Omar a écrit :
In my own estimation, there is simply not enough support for this
proposal, and overwhelming opposition.
Yes, I understand.
Thanks for everyone
Khaled
*From:*Lee Howard [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:25 PM
*To:* Khaled Omar; Suresh Krishnan
*Subject:* Re: IETF Non-Working Group List for IPv10 Request.
*From: *Khaled Omar <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Date: *Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 7:28 AM
*To: *Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Cc: *Lee Howard <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject: *RE: IETF Non-Working Group List for IPv10 Request.
Hi Suresh,
The non-working group mailing list will show if there is interest on
discussing IPv10 or not.
If there is no demonstrated support for something, the IETF should not
spend resources on it. Otherwise, we are vulnerable to a denial of
service attack of unsupported ideas.
Since IPv10 I-D was uploaded to the IETF, I received dozens of
e-mail from people who are interested on this discussion, and from
people who are not interested as well, let’s take a step forward and
we will see it clearly.
If they are unwilling to demonstrate support on the IETF mailing list a
few months ago, or in the int-area mailing list now, why would a new
list make a difference?
As I said before, you are welcome, even encouraged, to set up your own
mailing list, using any email provider you choose, to give people a
place to start working on this.
In my own estimation, there is simply not enough support for this
proposal, and overwhelming opposition.
Lee
*From:*Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Thursday, September 14, 2017 1:09 AM
*To:* Khaled Omar
*Cc:* Lee Howard; Ted Lemon
*Subject:* Re: IETF Non-Working Group List for IPv10 Request.
Hi Khaled,
I have not seen interest in this draft that warrants a creation
of a non-WG mailing list for this purpose.
Thanks
Suresh
On Sep 12, 2017, at 5:41 PM, Khaled Omar
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Suresh,
I would like to make a request for an IETF non-working group
list for IPv10 discussion.
Please find the following information below:
* The name and email address of the submitterèKhaled
Omar,[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
* The name of the listèIPv10.
* The URL or email address of the listè[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
* The name(s) and email address(es) of the list
administrator(s)èKhaled Omar,[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
* A summary description of the list to be included in the
table on this pageèIPv10 allows communication between IPv4
and IPv6 hosts.
* A more detailed explanation of the purpose of the list to be
included on the mailman page and sent in the announcement of
the list that is sent to the communityèIP version 10 (IPv10)
is a new version of the Internet Protocol, designed to allow
IP version 6 [RFC-2460] to communicate to IP version 4
(IPv4) [RFC-791] and vice versa.
* The IETF Area to which the list belongsèInt-area.
Please forward the approved request toè[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Thanks in advance,
Khaled Omar
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
