Hi Khaled,

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 12:31 PM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Suresh,
>  
> The problem I’m trying to solve is to overcome the depletion of IPv4 address 
> space and the lack of implementing IPv6 , this will cause the IPv6 only hosts 
> not to be able to access the whole internet as there will be IPv6 only hosts 
> (18% of the Internet traffic) against the domination of IPv4 only hosts (82% 
> of the Internet traffic),

The part that is not clear is why you believe IPv10 will be any more successful 
or quicker to widespread deployment than IPv6. Can you share your thoughts?

>  
> IPmix allows IPv6 only hosts to communicate to IPv4 only hosts and vice 
> versa, and this will allow the coexistence of both version without any 
> separation or division on the Internet

NAT64 (RFC6146) already allows "IPv6 only hosts to communicate to IPv4 only 
hosts and vice versa”.

Regards
Suresh

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to