Hi Alex, > NAT64 (RFC6146) already allows "IPv6 only hosts to communicate to IPv4 > only hosts and vice versa”.
As mentioned on the draft, NAT64 requires so much translations binding in addition to getting the DNS64 involved in the communication process that’s why NAT64 is not widespread. Khaled -----Original Message----- From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2017 10:08 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Int-area] Request for a mailing list to IPmix I-D. Le 29/09/2017 à 18:47, Suresh Krishnan a écrit : > Hi Khaled, > >> On Sep 29, 2017, at 12:31 PM, Khaled Omar >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Suresh, >> The problem I’m trying to solve is to overcome the depletion of IPv4 >> address space and the lack of implementing IPv6 , this will cause the >> IPv6 only hosts not to be able to access the whole internet as there >> will be IPv6 only hosts (18% of the Internet traffic) against the >> domination of IPv4 only hosts (82% of the Internet traffic), > > The part that is not clear is why you believe IPv10 will be any more > successful or quicker to widespread deployment than IPv6. Can you > share your thoughts? > >> IPmix allows IPv6 only hosts to communicate to IPv4 only hosts and >> vice versa, and this will allow the coexistence of both version >> without any separation or division on the Internet > > NAT64 (RFC6146) already allows "IPv6 only hosts to communicate to IPv4 > only hosts and vice versa”. I think I agree. NAT64 may have some advantages, have a user base, but it may also have some drawbacks. The same about DNS64 RFC6147. If I remember correctly, NAT64, and/or DNS64, maye have been worked in the v6ops WG? Was it considered to bring this work to v6ops? Alex > > Regards > Suresh > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
