You might also want to look at tsvwg-udp-options
In one case, they’re used to support PLPMTUD (which you already note).
Alternatively, they provide transport-layer frag/reassembly that might be
useful for DNSSEC as well as enabling NAT-traversal by retaining ports across
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 8:46 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 5, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Joe Touch <to...@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>> This doc completely overlooks the role of fragmentation in IP over IP
>> tunneling and the reason fragmentation is critical (IP has a maximum packet
>> size, not just a minimum).
>> See draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels.
> Good point. We will take a look at intarea-tunnels and look at some changes
> to the fragmentation draft.
>> As a result, IMO the recommendations and conclusions are incorrect.
>>> On Mar 5, 2018, at 6:16 AM, Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net> wrote:
>>> Please review draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile-01 and provide comments.
>>> The URL is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile-01.
>>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area mailing list
Int-area mailing list