On May 1, 2018, at 12:36 PM, Dave O'Reilly <[email protected]> wrote: > 3. If there is a more appropriate forum for discussion, what do you think it > is?
I didn't say that there was a better forum. I said that you haven't said anything to convince me that the IETF in particular should be working on this, or that it's worth my time in particular to try to help you navigate the balance between doing something you think is necessary and making things worse for the online safety of Internet users. In particular, this is not an internet governance issue. You are talking about logging of A+P on servers on the internet, not the operation of the internet. Again, don't tell me what the value of this is to you. We already understand that it's valuable to you. Try to figure out how it's valuable to the IETF. Why we should spend time working on it. Tell us why we should put the IETF's name on it, and say that it's how the IETF recommends things be done. The problem is that you've already tried to do that, and it wasn't convincing. I don't think this is something the IETF should work on, and you haven't convinced me otherwise. It seems to me more like something a government standards org should work on. That would make it applicable in the right context, and would prevent it from becoming a blanket recommendation, which is what it would have to be if the IETF published it.
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
