On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:53 AM Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 3/8/2019 7:37 AM, Tom Herbert wrote: > > Isn't the general consensus to move away from fragmentation as much as > possible? > > I don't believe so. There are still a lot of valid use cases for > fragmentation. draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-09 talks about the > current state fo fragmentation. > > Agreed, but if UDP supports fragmentation (it will), then we don't need that > capability buried in obscure layering. > UDP fragmentation would only with UDP, it doesn't help any other transport protovcol. Also, I don't understand how the fragmentation extension header, which has been defined for over twenty years and is now part of an Internet standard, can be called "obscured layering".
Tom > Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
