Where do they want to use this, and why not request a new protocol value? (What did [email protected] say?)
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 08:07, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> wrote: > The authors of https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhu-intarea-gma-03.txt > would like to use IP protocol 114 as it is described as “Any 0-hop > protocol” on the IANA page[1]. Alas, on the IANA page, there is no > reference to this “Any 0-hop protocol”. > > > > Obviously, we all understand that this must be a protocol using hop limit > = 0 (or TTL=0 for the legacy protocol). > > > > When there is no reference for a IANA number, this means that this number > was assigned _*before*_ IANA, possibly by J. Postel and nobody at IANA > and in the IESG know more. Hence, my questions to the community: > > > > Q1) does anyone know about a more formal reference / specification for > this protocol 114 > > > > Q2) does anyone know about a RFC or a protocol using this protocol 114 ? > > > > Please note that I do not ask for comments/reviews on the draft itself > (they are welcome though on the [email protected] mailing list even if > this is not a WG document). And it is also mostly obvious that only one > transport layer can exist on the top of this protocol. > > > > Regards, > > > > -éric (INT AD) > > > > > > [1] > https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
