Tom, Now that you are on the IANA considerations, I would appreciate if you can consider updating it to request a codepoint from the tunnel registry available at: https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-6. More rationale can be found in RFC-to-be-8675 (draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel).
Registration guidelines are available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thaler-iftype-reg. Cheers, Med De : Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Tom Herbert Envoyé : jeudi 24 octobre 2019 00:16 À : Greg Mirsky Cc : int-area; [email protected] Objet : Re: [Int-area] GUE: IANA Considerations question On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, 8:07 AM Greg Mirsky <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Joe, I'll be happy with a single Experimental code point. Okay. We can have one exp code point and define RFC6994 mechanism. Tom Regards, Greg On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:50 AM Joe Touch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It would also be useful to understand why you think more than one code point is needed for experiments (vs the RFC6994-style approach). Joe On Oct 23, 2019, at 7:36 AM, Bob Hinden <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Greg, On Oct 23, 2019, at 6:44 AM, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear Authors, et al., I have a rather benign question the new registry requested in Section 8.3. The draft states that the whole 1-127 range is "RFC required" per RFC 5226. Firstly, a nit - RFC 5226 has been obsoleted by RFC 8126. My question is Would you agree to split the 128-255 range and set First Come First Served sub-range. For example: Please explain why you are proposing this change. Thanks, Bob +----------------+------------------+---------------+ | Control type | Description | Reference | +----------------+------------------+---------------+ | 0 | Control payload | This document | | | needs more | | | | context for | | | | interpretation | | | | | | | 1..127 | Unassigned | | | | | | | 128..250 | First Come | RFC 8126 | | | First Served | | | 251..254 | Experimental | This document | | | | | | 255 | Reserved | This document | | | | | +----------------+------------------+---------------+ Also, you may consider updating 0 as Reserved and assigning 1 as Control payload ... Much appreciate your consideration. Regards, Greg _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
