> On Dec 12, 2019, at 6:47 AM, Vladimir Olteanu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> > All that
>> > should be required is a functional TLS layer. (Session resumption might
>> > not be supported by the library, it becomes complicated if you're using
>> > an L4 load-balancer etc. etc.)
>>
>> True, if the TLS termination is implemented separately from the SOCKS server
>> then this could be hard to achieve. Port 1080 is reserved for SOCKS on both
>> TCP and UDP, so maybe this requirement could apply only when using TLS and
>> DTLS on the same host and port.
>>
> It could be that TLS and DTLS are terminated by separate processes, or even
> separate machines, ..
>
Same IP address means it would need to act as if it were the same machine.
Coordinating shared use of an IP address between two separate hosts is the
implementers problem, not the protocol designers.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
