Hi Barry, Thanks very much for the review!
I'm keeping pending changes available here, to be published after the telechat: https://github.com/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/pull/25 I've fixed the typo in section 6, and added "Fragment identifier considerations" to the media type registration (as well as updating the style to use N/A instead of None as specified by RFC 6838). Thanks, Tommy > On Jan 16, 2020, at 9:00 PM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains-10: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-provisioning-domains/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Nit in Section 6: “an hostile network access provider”. > > In Section 8.4, please add the “Fragment identifier considerations” entry in > the template, as required by RFC 6838. > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
