Hi Alex,

I hope you are well and keeping safe.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-area <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
> Sent: April 2, 2020 12:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?
> 
> Hi,
> Please allow me to intervene.
> 
> I have several signs (e.g. motorshow of September cancelled, among other
> public signs) that make me think there wont be an IETF108 f2f in Madrid.
[JCZ] This is indeed possible.

> 
> As such, I think it would be appropriate to propose a date for a virtual 
> interim,
> maybe in July(?)
[JCZ] This is what I meant by sending more details once we know more about 
IETF108. We should have more info in May.

> 
> Ideally, one should have a meeting continuity plan, that tells how we should
> continue intarea WG meetings, facing unexpected events of today's
> interconnected and interdependent world.  Such a plan should be made at IETF
> level.  IT should be a public plan, not a secret plan.
[JCZ] Yes. If there is no physical meeting we will hold a virtual one. It will 
be announced, once it is known.

> 
> We should not be indulging - again - in a mode where we simply react.
[JCZ] No, this time it will be announced a few months before. However, we still 
have time to do it properly.

> 
> If we cant get to make an IETF meeting continuity plan, then maybe we can
> run a doodle to select a date for a meeting of intarea WG.
[JCZ] At this moment it is too early to run doodles. Once we know where we 
stand with respect to IETF108 physical/virtual, we can then discuss about 
dates, time-zones and other logistics.

> 
> Or we can discuss about what makes one think there _will_ be an IETF108 in
> Madrid?  What signs does one have to support that supposition?
[JCZ] I would consider that discussion out-of-scope for this list.

Best,

Juan Carlos 

> 
> Alex, LF/HF 1
> 
> Le 02/04/2020 à 17:44, Juan Carlos Zuniga a écrit :
> > Hi Bob,
> >
> > No, we have decided to cancel IntArea WG for IETF107.
> >
> > We will be sending details about the next meeting once we know more
> > details about IETF108.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Juan Carlos & Wassim
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > *From:* Bob Hinden <[email protected]>
> > *Sent:* Saturday, March 28, 2020 11:38
> > *To:* Wassim Haddad
> > *Cc:* Bob Hinden; int-area; [email protected]
> > *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] Int Area Interim Meeting?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> > ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fint-
> area&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cjuancarlos
> >
> .zuniga%40sigfox.com%7C059e3392d0ec4278f33308d7d72639bd%7Cfcbc8bb
> 1061e
> >
> 4b949f703ad917b0c8d3%7C0%7C0%7C637214431489022251&amp;sdata=h
> dm4yuPS7A
> > 4o4l0uqnPR4uQbeWwCR8k%2BpjS%2F0Q4tXgU%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ie
> tf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fint-
> area&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cjuancarlos.zuniga%40sigfox.com%7C059e3392d
> 0ec4278f33308d7d72639bd%7Cfcbc8bb1061e4b949f703ad917b0c8d3%7C0
> %7C0%7C637214431489022251&amp;sdata=hdm4yuPS7A4o4l0uqnPR4uQbe
> WwCR8k%2BpjS%2F0Q4tXgU%3D&amp;reserved=0

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to