Hi, Fred, > On Apr 16, 2020, at 2:36 PM, Templin (US), Fred L <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, two important documents in this wg have been sitting idle for a long time > and > perhaps it is time to start moving them forward again. The documents are: "IP > Fragmentation Considered Fragile", and "IP Tunnels in the Internet > Architecture": > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels/ > > What has changed is that we now have a spec for robust fragmentation over > tunnels > while supporting a 9180 MTU (actually MRU) plus lossless path MTU discovery. > The > spec is known as the Overlay Multilink Network (OMNI) Interface: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-6man-omni-interface/ > > So, what I think needs to happen is for authors of the two intarea drafts to > review > the OMNI spec and update their documents accordingly. Then, maybe we can get > a few docs published?
As lead author of intarea-tunnels, that doc has never been held waiting for a new solution. Quite the contrary - it is complicated by yet another doc to check and include. It would be useful to indicate whether your doc already follows the recommendations there or not, as a start. Besides that, the only other thing that would help is someone to have the IESG stop writing “individual” submissions that I need to stop other work to deal with ;-) Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
