>> It takes many types of engineer to design the Internet, some will be good at >> somethings, others will have complementary skills. What is important is that >> as a team we create a design that meets the requirement.
And this is what I ask for. >> To suggest that absence of a particular skill disqualifies an individual >> from participating is one of the most counter-divestity things I have heard >> on this list. Shouldn’t be one man show. We cannot repeat that millions of time, someone should run STP please ☺ Khaled Omar From: Int-area <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 6:12 PM To: Ted Lemon <[email protected]> Cc: int-area <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10) If you can’t write code, what business do you have proposing standards? Proposing standards is an additional skill on top of network programming, not a separate skillset. That is an opinion. I am not sure it is correct, or necessary to express it. It is not one that I agree with. It takes many types of engineer to design the Internet, some will be good at somethings, others will have complementary skills. What is important is that as a team we create a design that meets the requirement. To suggest that absence of a particular skill disqualifies an individual from participating is one of the most counter-divestity things I have heard on this list. My concern at that remark should not be taken as an opinion one way or the other on the protocol proposal we are discussing. - Stewart
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
