I think this is the right time to start working on the code as Eric planned.
Khaled Omar -----Original Message----- From: Int-area <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Fred Baker Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:19 PM To: Roland Bless <[email protected]> Cc: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]>; int-area <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10) For the record, he has also requested air time in V6ops. I responded to him with a similar request, and added an additional point that I suspect should be important in int-area as well. The objective is to turn Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways... > On Sep 17, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Roland Bless <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Eric, > >> On 17.09.20 at 20:43 Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote: >> Khaled, >> >> As you may have guessed from other replies, it would HELP A LOT if you >> uploaded a revised I-D taking into account the previous comments (and not >> only the filename change) including those about deployment, scalability, ... >> >> So, I am afraid that without a revised I-D addressing those problems, the >> discussion will go nowhere as we can see now on the intarea mailing list. >> >> As long as there is no such revised I-D, I see no point in continuing this >> discussion or presenting an old version of the IPv10 draft at an IETF >> meeting. >> >> Thank you in advance for a revised I-D [1] addressing the previous comments >> from a couple of years ago. Then, I am sure that this WG will review it. > > Besides my already expressed concerns that this proposal is > technically not sound and in itself already contradicting, there has > been another > (later) version that already used a different name (IPmix). > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipmix-01 > I actually don't know why Khaled used the old IPv10 term again, but I > know several cases where blogs and "press" took this for a serious > "IETF" proposal, causing quite some confusion at that time. > So please do NOT use the term IPv10 as it will cause lots of confusion > outside the IETF. > > We have been there before... > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/4vhoJou8FTXJThDuRgleqDl > pTT4/ > > So I agree that it makes no sense to discuss this even further without > an updated I-D that addresses all concerns expressed so far. > > Regards, > Roland > > >> Regards >> >> -éric (and for information the responsible Area Director for intarea >> WG) >> >> [1] and having some interns/students working on experimental code would be a >> big proof that your idea does work in real life. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Int-area <[email protected]> on behalf of "Eric Vyncke >> (evyncke)" <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 15:46 >> To: Khaled Omar <[email protected]>, int-area >> <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]> >> Cc: Ron Bonica <[email protected]> >> Subject: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New >> Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10) >> >> Hello Khaled, >> >> In your email, you refer to >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06 but may I assume that you >> meant the latest 2018 version >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-11 ? >> >> Anyway, before presenting the draft, a revised IETF draft should be >> uploaded as all previous revisions are expired. >> >> You also have received some feedback on the mailing lists, did you >> incorporate them in a revision ? >> >> The above steps are really the critical conditions to present a draft at >> an IETF meeting. >> >> Regards >> >> -éric >> > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
