Yes Ole, it is not just a matter of saying "it's not going to work", you have to read the draft till the end and guarantee that your comments are adding a value for all.
Khaled Omar -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 2:13 PM To: Gert Doering <[email protected]> Cc: Khaled Omar <[email protected]>; IPv6 Operations <[email protected]>; int-area <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Int-area] Still need to know what has changed.... Re: IPv10 draft Gert, >> As I'm here on the list discussing it, we should come to a final conclusion >> and start working on making it official, just to have a clear mind with good >> intention and everything will be fine. > > We have come to a conclusion: you present some running code, and then > we start spending cycles on it. > > Everybody who replied told you that it's not going to work the way you > envisage. To counter that, bring proof, in the form of running code. I think it needs a little more than that. In my opinion it needs to show how it can be incrementally deployable. And easier incrementally deployable than just deploying IPv6. Cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
