Adding the SOCKSv5 authors in the loop as well as the concluded IETF AFT WG (Authenticated Firewall Traversal)
As some recipients were authors of RFC 1928, your feedback will be welcome Regards -éric From: Int-area <[email protected]> on behalf of Juan Carlos Zuniga <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, 25 November 2020 at 04:35 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [Int-area] Call for SAAG comments on draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6 Hello, IntArea WG is planning to adopt draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6, and a circulation with SAAG was suggested at IETF 109. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6-11 The document has been discussed for quite some time already at IntArea, it has evolved significantly, and it has received positive comments. Below you also have some pointers to existing implementations. If you have an opinion on whether this document should be adopted please cc this email to both saag and IntArea. Thanks, Juan-Carlos & Wassim (IntArea Chairs) -------- In anticipation of the adoption call, I'd like to share the status of our SOCKS v6 implementation. We have the following pieces of software, all released under a very permissive license: * A library for creating and parsing SOCKS v6 requests and responses (incl. options and sanity checks). It's feature-complete as of -08: https://github.com/45G/libsocks6msg * A utility library: https://github.com/45G/libsocks6util * A TCP proxy and transparent proxifier. (TCP Bind, UDP and v5-style authentication are not supported yet.) Most notable features are implemented: TLS1.3 with early data, idempotence, sessions, 0-RTT authentication, TFO, MPTCP and DNS. https://github.com/45G/sixtysocks
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
