Hi Eric, I am sure you know, all independent Submission documents can only be published as Informational. I did not check what status the authors wish to have but it is good to mention here.
Regards, Behcet On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:55 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke= [email protected]> wrote: > Vladimir, Dragos, > > > > While there was some interest in adopting the SOCKv6 document as an > INT-AREA WG document, the lukewarm interest and lack of reviewer volunteers > [1] are preventing the actual adoption of this document as a WG document > (my AD decision in agreement with the chairs). After discussions with the > IESG and our chairs (Juan Carlos and Wassim in cc), I want to propose to > the authors an easier way to publish this document as an RFC but in the > Independent Submissions (ISE) stream rather than in the usual IETF stream. > > > > The simple process is outlined at > https://www.rfc-editor.org/about/independent/ and “ISE” is described in > RFC 4846. > > > > This should allow this document to move forward and be published as a RFC. > > > > Hope this helps > > > > -éric (with JC & Wassim) > > > > [1] I tried to contact the previous AFT WG proponents, SOCKS authors, and > some open source SOCKS implementors without any reply on this topic. > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
