On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 2:59 PM Seth David Schoen <sch...@loyalty.org> wrote:
> When we presented our reserved address space drafts at the previous IETF > meeting, we noticed that the most common concern was not so much about > the substance of our proposals as about the question of whether intarea > and the IETF should be working on IPv4 fixes at all I can't say for sure whether this was the most common concern, but what I remember as the main concern was that your proposal wouldn't actually do what you want, but would create a great deal of work for the IETF and for implementors, with no clear upside. That’s actually a good test for whether it makes sense to do new IPv4 maintenance work, and I don’t think changing the balance on that is going to be an improvement.
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
