I have read the draft and support WG adoption. Allocating an IP protocol number seems reasonable.
Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:15 PM Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad= 40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Dear IntArea WG, > > > > We are starting a 2-week call for adoption of *“**Internet Protocol > Number for SCHC”* draft: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-ip-protocol-number/01/ > > > > If you have an opinion on whether this document should be adopted by the > IntArea WG please indicate it on the WG mailing list by end of Wednesday, > September 28th. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Wassim & Juan-Carlos > > (IntArea WG chairs) > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
