On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 16:43, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, Fred (et al.), > > It might be useful to be clear whether this option MUST NOT be used on > atomic datagrams (i.e., where IPv4 DF==1 or when not source fragmented) and > that it cannot be used for purposes other than reassembly (as the regular > ID is per RFC 6484). > Hi all This draft is being discussed across three different lists - intarea, ipv6 and the IETF list. As the latter list is for general topics only [1], I am removing it from the thread. Please continue to discuss on the intarea list, and if appropriate ipv6. A simple 'reply all' should now achieve this. Thanks, Chris Box on behalf of the Moderators team for [email protected] [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
