Dear IntArea Chairs, A reminder that the authors of draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6 - "IPv4 routes with an IPv6 next hop" <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6/> have requested adoption of this document by the IntArea WG.
W On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:00 AM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > Dear IntArea Chairs, > > The authors of draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6 - "IPv4 routes with an > IPv6 next hop" > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6/> would > like to request adoption of this document by the IntArea WG. > > It's been a few weeks since the meeting, so here are some helpful > resources (I'd managed to swap out all state, so I assume you have too :-)): > Draft: draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6 - "IPv4 routes with an IPv6 > next hop" > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6/> > Slides: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/122/materials/ > slides-122-intarea-ipv4-routes-with-an-ipv6-next-hop-00.pdf > Video recording (linked to discussion): https://youtu.be/ > NkbWXK1I-74?t=2926 > > Very hight level summaries of comments (apologies in advance if I > misunderstood your point, or over summarized!): > > David Lamparter: Concern — this should also work on hosts; the host is > just the first router. Please include a note that they are also covered. > > Tobias Fiebig: 8950 — Please please go ahead with this. It works on hosts. > I’ve setup an AS with only V6 other than on the hosts. > > David Schinazi: This is great, I support it and am happy to review. > > Maria Matejka: There are some people requesting translations Would like > more guidance on not routing differently between v4 and v6. [ Note: The > audio was not great, and I may have missed a bunch of detail. Apologies.] > > Name inaudible: It is unclear if SAVNET will allow the borrowed address to > be used. Please make sure that SAVNET WG is aware. > > Krishnaswamy Ananthamurthy: Cisco Nrxus OS has implemented this for more > than 8 years. Are you also planning on covering recursive next hops? Your > example does, but please add details in the draft. > > Éric Vyncke: This is V4 via V6, but please note that it also works for V6 > via V4. > With AD hat:I don't think that Standards Track is the right track for this > document. > W: Yeah, this should probably be Informational, or *possibly* BCP. > Chairs: If you agree that this should be adopted, please let us know which > :-) > > Thanks for you time, > Warren Kumari >
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
