Chairs, Friendly reminder about the request for WG adoption posted below. The email reflector added “[pim]” to the subject because I CC’d the pim WG on it, so that may have caused some confusion.
Also, we received word that IANA has made an internal note that 49149 has been requested by this draft. This will keep it from being assigned to another application before publication. Thanks, Nate From: Karstens, Nate <Nate.Karstens=40garmin....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2025 04:04 To: intarea-cha...@ietf.org Cc: int-area@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org; 'draft-karstens-intarea-multicast-application-port....@ietf.org' <draft-karstens-intarea-multicast-application-port....@ietf.org> Subject: [pim] Request for WG adoption call for draft-karstens-intarea-multicast-application-port Chairs, This draft was discussed by pim during IETF 118 & 120 and intarea during IETF 121 & 122. There have also been some reviews on the mailing list. Would this be an appropriate time to consider adoption by the intarea WG? https: //datatracker. ietf. org/doc/draft-karstens-intarea-multicast-application-port/ Chairs, This draft was discussed by pim during IETF 118 & 120 and intarea during IETF 121 & 122. There have also been some reviews on the mailing list. Would this be an appropriate time to consider adoption by the intarea WG? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karstens-intarea-multicast-application-port/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-karstens-intarea-multicast-application-port/__;!!EJc4YC3iFmQ!VEtFF_pY6gQmN4laOkvtX7sqWXPGOJ9IfO4nA-6FOA09l97b1krzunJBu5kfiq_iiHtct_mYlxauMQCKLHbtvCiCvJH2NRREdA$> Regards, Nate
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
