Inline........
Juniper Business Use Only
________________________________
From: Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin=40boeing....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 2:45 PM
To: Ron Bonica <rbon...@juniper.net>; Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga)
<juzun...@cisco.com>; Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WGLC for "IP Tunnels in the Internet Architecture"
draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Ron,
It can and should change behaviors regarding the essential nature of
fragmentation and reassembly for tunnels.
[RB] I didn't get that part. Can you explain how?
That is a large part of why my drafts always combine encapsulation with
fragmentation and also why I published “Fragmentation Revisited”. I think the
document should remain in IETF channels.
Thank you - Fred
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2025 11:31 AM
To: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga) <juzuniga=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>;
Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Int-area] Re: WGLC for "IP Tunnels in the Internet
Architecture" draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels
EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments.
Folks,
This is an excellent overview of tunnel technology. However, I wonder if the
publication of this draft will change anyone's behavior. If not, I wonder if
the IETF stream is the right place for this document. Maybe the independent
stream is more appropriate? Maybe the Internet Protocol Journal or a blog?
Maybe even a chapter in a textbook?
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
________________________________
From: Juan Carlos Zuniga (juzuniga)
<juzuniga=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:juzuniga=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 1:41 AM
To: Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org<mailto:int-area@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Int-area] WGLC for "IP Tunnels in the Internet Architecture"
draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Dear IntArea WG,
The authors of Draft
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-15<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-15__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!AST0foNqNIWijq2ReXb3w8D4mUd3Sx53MI5Quv7oqyWSY5IiiLSevttp23VbJW6DPwYlIGVUjeYKV6KJK2lGv0LA3FpSqC0$>
are requesting a WGLC. The latest draft was presented at IETF 123 and we heard
some comments from the floor.
Hence, we are starting now a 2-week WG Last Call. We would like to receive at
least 5 substantial reviews to move forward.
Please express your support/comments by replying to this email. To compensate
for the summer break, the call will end on Friday the 22nd of August (AoE).
Thanks,
Juan-Carlos & Wassim
(IntArea WG chairs)
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
