On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 7:54 AM Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 9:19 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.i...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've reviewed this document and support publication. A couple silly
>> thoughts below:
>>
>> I was amused by the statement "which is commonly done in networks using
>> the OSI protocol suite". I didn't know we still had those. Or perhaps all
>> properties are true on the empty set?
>>
>
> Oh. How about s/is commonly done/was commonly done/? That was we can avoid
> the discussion around if X.25 and IS-IS count… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>

"was commonly done" is a great choice :-)

Since the mentions of draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6 will be removed before
>> publication, I would recommend mentioning RFC 9229 in the acknowledgements.
>> I know that the first authors of both documents are good friends, but they
>> still deserve credit.
>>
>
> Sorry, I'm confused — I'm more than happy to acknowledge people, but
> RFC9229 / draft-ietf-babel-v4viav6 were both written by Juliusz Chroboczek,
> who is also an author of this document. Obviously Juliusz deserves credit,
> but I think it would be odd to credit him in a document where he's also an
> author.
>
> I suspect that I have missed something though, because you said "authors",
> so I think I may be completely misunderstanding what you said.
>

That's what I get for trying to make a clever joke :-) I wasn't suggesting
that Juliusz acknowledge himself, but I think mentioning the history would
be helpful. So I would recommend adding a sentence like this to the
Acknowledgements: <<This document was heavily inspired by earlier work to
instantiate these concepts in the Babel routing protocol [RFC 9229].>>

David

Thanks,
> W
>
>
>> David
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 11:51 AM Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad=
>> 40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Intarea WG,
>>>
>>> This email triggers a WGLC for the “*IPv4 routes with an IPv6 next hop
>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6/>*”
>>> draft. This document went through multiple revisions, and the chairs and
>>> authors believe it is now ready for WGLC.
>>>
>>> Please (re)-review the draft and send your comments and feedback to
>>> Intarea ML.
>>>
>>> Please note this is a 2-week WGLC ending on 09/26/2025 at 23:59:59 UTC.
>>>
>>> Thanks much and have a great WE!
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Juan Carlos & Wassim
>>>
>>> Internet Area WG Chairs
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to