Hi, I have completed my shepherd review of draft-ietf-intarea-multicast-application-port-05. The document is in good shape overall. I have two minor comments for the authors to consider before we proceed.
(1) In the last paragraph before Section 1.1, the sentence "An application may use this port in conjunction with a unicast port to balance out deficiencies related to multicast distribution" uses "may" in lowercase. If the intent is to grant explicit permission (i.e., a normative MAY per BCP 14), it should be capitalized. If it is purely descriptive, lowercase is fine, but it would be good if the authors could confirm their intent. (2) The term "Multicast Application Port" is used as a proper noun throughout the document (including in the title) but is never formally introduced or defined. A short definitional sentence early in Section 1 or Section 2, such as "This port is referred to in this document as the Multicast Application Port", would improve clarity. Neither comment is a blocker. Happy to discuss. Carlos -- CARLOS J. BERNARDOS https://www.it.uc3m.es/cjbc/ Universidad Carlos III de Madrid RTS/CTS podcast: https://castopod.cjbc.eu/@RTSCTS YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/CacharREDando/
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
