Pekka Nikander wrote:
So, publish the current draft as Informational with a suitable note
saying that this is the currently deployed practise, stating that
there are architectural problems in the way it is done, and that the
practise should not be extended? And at the same time, try to do the
right thing for IPv6, and possible future IPv4 extensions?
--Pekka Nikander
I'm having a hard time seeing why this would be wrong :-)
Spencer
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
