Pekka Nikander wrote: > As I wrote, I can't see how we could convince the world from going > from where we are now to a world that requires people to > change their > network stack, add a new piece of infrastructure, and to change > applications at the same time. That won't happen, any more.
This is also my confusion in the thread. I thought the I-D wanted to retain the 128-bit structure, but change the semantics, specifically so as not to require changes in the IP stack. > Doesn't that transition strategy make any sense to you? What is > wrong with it? > > If you are worried that once established such hook for an identifier > space within the address space is likely to last for a long time, > please say so. > > --Pekka Bert _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
